Why is the United Nations always wrong?

As usual, the United Nations is dead wrong. Yes, civilians were killed when an Israeli attempt to take out a missile launcher in Lebanon took out a building in a civilian neighborhood. But...

1) The Israelis warned of an impending strike so non-combatants could flee.
2) Hezbollah consistently fires rockets from civilian neighborhoods in order to use civilians as either a shield or a built-in political football when casualties occur.
3) Hezbollan consistently fires rockets at civilian targets on purpose, but their accuracy is such that the rockets often land in relatively empty fields.

How can the UN condemn the Israelis for this conflict when they are the ones who have been attacked first and are under a continual bombardment of missiles? Why is there no world-wide condemnation of terrorists who force civilians to remain near their emplacements so they may try to hide behind them? Why no condemnation of the continual lobbing of rockets with only civilian targets into Israel? Why?

I heard a commentator on the news say, "Kofi doesn't know his Anan from his elbow!"

Liberal moonbats, surrender-monkee rags like the New York Times, the United Nations, wimpy defeatist countries like France and political opportunists like Iran will all take the side of the terrorists.

Which side are you on?